![]() ![]() Demonstrating that that label is appropriate is the purpose of this article. I casually referred to it as such in a 2020 article published by The Gospel Coalition. dissertation on the New England Puritans and yet I did not know that referring to the original Massachusetts Bay Colony as a “Bible Commonwealth” was questionable. As for reputable historians who specialized in New England Puritanism, Perry Miller (1905 –1963) championed the idea that Massachusetts was a “Bible Commonwealth.” To attribute the “Bible Commonwealth” label to Boot and Bahnsen, rather than Miller, is odd. Citing Joe Boot, Greg Bahnsen (1948-1995) “and others” as peddlers of this “common false narrative,” he claims that “better historians,” like George Haskins (1915-1991) put that idea “to bed.” But Haskins was a legal scholar, a professor of law, and not primarily a historian. However, Mr Cline, in his justifiable attempt to dissociate Puritanism from (that definition of) theonomy, appears to over-reach by seeking to over-turn the claim that the New England colonies (save Rhode Island) were “Bible Commonwealths” – that is, Protestant theocracies. Cline is right to conclude that Puritanism was decidedly non-theonomic. Cline mustered, Increase Mather articulated their view succinctly: “the Works of God have a voice in them, as well as his Word.” So, insofar as theonomy is a rejection of natural law, Mr. Cline demonstrates that Puritans repeatedly extolled natural law. ![]() He is correct, in his major thesis, that the claim that “Puritanism and the natural law tradition are antithetical” is “wildly ahistorical.” Mr. ![]() In this integrated series of brilliant and witty essays which he describes as “pieces,” Perry Miller invites and stimulates in the reader a new conception of his own inheritance.Timon Cline wrote recently that “theonomists” didn’t run Puritan New England. In this book, as in all his work, the author of The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century The New England Mind: From Colony to Province and The Transcendentalists, emphasizes the need for understanding the human sources from which the American mainstream has risen. Thus left alone with America, who were they? And what were they to do? For the second generation in America discovered that their heroic parents had, in fact, been sent on a fool’s errand, the bitterest kind of all that the dream of a model society to be built in purity by the elect in the new continent was now a dream that meant nothing more to Europe. Miller’s engrossing account of what happened to the European mind when, in spite of itself, it began to become something other than European. This crucial uncertainty of the age is the starting point of Mr. But the original speaker’s underlying concern was with the fateful ambiguity in the word errand. Like so many jeremiads of its time, this sermon appeared to be addressed to the sinful and unregenerate whom God was about to destroy. The title, Errand into the Wilderness, is taken from the title of a Massachusetts election sermon of 1670. Miller makes this abundantly clear and real, and in doing so allows the reader to conclude that, whatever else America might have become, it could never have developed into a society that took itself for granted. Disguised from twentieth-century readers first by the New Testament language and thought of the Puritans and later by the complacent transcendentalist belief in the oversoul, the related problems of purpose and reason-for-being have been central to the American experience from the very beginning. They go to the roots of seventeenth-century thought and of the ever-widening and quickening flow of events since then. These questions are by no means frivolous. Miller’s lifelong purpose to answer: What was the underlying aim of the first colonists in coming to America? In what light did they see themselves? As men and women undertaking a mission that was its own cause and justification? Or did they consider themselves errand boys for a higher power which might, as is frequently the habit of authority, change its mind about the importance of their job before they had completed it? The title of this book by Perry Miller, who is world-famous as an interpreter of the American past, comes close to posing the question it has been Mr. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |